How talat compares

There are a lot of ways to get meeting notes now, and most of them work the same way: a bot joins your call, your audio goes to someone’s cloud, and the transcript and summary live on their servers. talat is the one that doesn’t. It captures audio locally, transcribes on your own machine, and keeps everything on the device it was recorded on.

Here’s how that stacks up against the tools you’re probably weighing. We’ve tried to be fair: where a competitor is genuinely better at something, the individual pages say so.

At a glance

A quick side-by-side.

 talatGranolaOtter.aiFireflies
Audio processingOn-deviceCloudCloudCloud
Audio leaves your deviceNeverYesYesYes
Meeting botNoNoYesYes
Models trained on your dataNo; nothing leaves your deviceYes, unless you opt outYes (de-identified)No
Works offlineYesNoNoNo
Account requiredNoYesYesYes
PricingFrom $9/mo, or $189 onceLimited free tier, then from $14/moLimited free tier, then from $16.99/moLimited free tier, then from $18/mo
AI summariesOn-device LLM or your own cloud API keyCloudCloudCloud (credit capped)
Dictate into any appYesNoNoNo
Import existing recordingsYes (audio & video, on-device)NoYes (cloud upload)Yes (cloud upload)
Full comparison →Full comparison →Full comparison →
Built in

The AI notes inside your meeting app.

No separate bot to add, but each one only covers its own platform and processes your meeting in the vendor’s cloud.

By what matters

Searching by need, not brand?

If you’re here because of what a meeting tool should protect rather than which one you already use:

Try talat

10 hours free, no account.

Download talat and use every feature with 10 hours of free recording time; no account or payment needed.